Gay Towns

Homosexuals as a Caste

It’s that time of year again. Or… Is it? It’s allegedly Pride Month, but I’ve seen an astonishing lack of rainbow flags. In real life, in branding, in advertisements… I don’t even see any posts about Pride Month. I never thought this day would come, but ‘woke’ truly is in retreat. For the first time on record, less young people are identifying as LGBTQ than in previous decades. Furthermore, American conservatives are becoming more anti-Homosexuality after decades of laxing views on it. It may be part of an overarching fatigue that Americans have with “special interest groups”, cancel culture, and DEI, which seem to have overstepped their boundaries in the years directly succeeding the racial reckoning of the George Floyd riots. The declining care for LGBTQ issues has inflamed the LGBTQ community, which resulted in an apparent increase in violence from the community (particularly the Transgenders), which decreased their popularity even more.

I think that, even if Transgenders didn’t drag LGBTQ down with them, the popularity of the LGB community still would have declined. Imagine how the public would feel about a group of straight people who have high rates of mental illness, sexual deviance, and venereal diseases, and now make them gay. There, you have the gay community. Also, effeminacy and mannishness among men and women respectively is annoying in its own right. Women get away with certain behavior quirks because they’re women, and so do men, and when the opposite sex has these quirks they are much more apparent and irritating. I’m convinced that exposure to flamboyant gay men has made men more sexist against women, because they have been forced to confront the fact that, when you get rid of the tits and vagina, a lot of female mannerisms come off as insufferable to guys. This is less the case for Lesbians because a lot more Lesbians are actually bisexual, and a lot more straight women are actually bisexual as well.

But, Pride Month still happened. For over a decade, it happened, and everyone in society was supposed to celebrate a group defined by their bizarre sexual tastes. I mean, could you imagine if we had a “Scat Pride” month? Could you imagine if Liberals were dressing up their children in brown and green, having them wear poop-emoji merch made by some 9 year old in China on attempt #3 to make it past the suicide net, to celebrate the scat community?

So why do Gay people, and more broadly the LGBTQ community in general, imagine themselves as an identity group?

My family usually vacations to the beach once or twice a summer. Something I’ve noticed about some beach towns is, well… They’re gay. Gay people have colonized them. Gay towns are not necessarily Liberal, they’re just gay. South of the Delaware bay, the indigenes are actually typically conservative, lily-white, and vaguely Southern. They’re actually my favorite type of Southern, they’re Seafood Southern. As opposed to Barbecue Southern and Deep Fried Southern, of course. A once-proud nation, now they are forced to provide a service economy for a bunch of old queens from Brooklyn. Indeed, even in non-gay beach towns, they are being replaced by geriatric retirees. Every bar looks kind of like a gay bar in these towns, possibly because they’re run by or funded by the gay transplant elite.

Gay towns are replete with gay gyms, which you can tell are gay by the gay music they play, and the concerning lack of extremely muscular animals lifting weights in their logo. Like, actual animals, of course. If their logo is an muscular furry, then stay as far away as possible from that place. I mean, maybe they’re just Foid gyms, but if that was the case they would just be 90% cardio like Planet Fitness. They seem to be oriented towards the Peter Thiel-esque “gays who don’t make it their whole personality” who watch Joe Rogan, are politically “moderate”, and are often affluent veterans. Do not be fooled by their straight demeanor, though. They are probably the ones most likely to try and molest you and your family members.

Why do gay people do this? Why do they coagulate? I believe gay towns are the exception, and not the rule, and the rule is gay cities with especially gay neighborhoods. Atlanta, San Francisco, and Portland are all famously gay cities. A whopping 1/6th of San Francisco identifies as LGBTQ. Gayborhoods are a worldwide phenomenon, with there being too many recorded examples to list.

The most obvious reason why gays live in the same spaces is because they only enjoy sexual relationships with their very small group. This reasoning is not limited to homosexuals, it also applies to various ethnic and religious groups that strongly encourage in-group marriage (ex: Hasidic Jews) or alternatively, are strongly discouraged from out-group marriage by an out-group (ex: Cagots). A secondary reason is because they have certain shared career demands. On one hand, LGBTQ people are much more likely than the ordinary population to involve themselves in the entertainment industry, be it through legal means like music and film, or through illegal or broadly illicit means like sex work. This causes them to gravitate towards tourist destinations and urban settings. On the other hand, they have large disposable incomes relative to their lines of work, as they don’t often need to financially support their spouse or any children. I think this may be a factor in some of these “gay towns”, where they compete for influence with non-gay retirees/pensioners who are in roughly the same privileged position. This is, again, an ethnic characteristic. As I have discussed at length before, groups with common occupational needs often coagulate into an ethnic group, or more accurately, a caste. Read my post on Blacksmith castes!

Gay people can never form a true caste on account of the basic biological fact that men cannot have babies with men, and women cannot have babies with women, and a man cannot become a woman even if he mutilates his genitalia to make it look vaguely vaginismal, and a woman cannot become a man even if she surgically removes a rod of thigh-flesh and attaches it to her pelvic area. However, they can and have formed pseudo-castes in recorded history. Most famously is the Gender-nonconforming Hijra community of India, and similar “Ladyboy” groups in Southeast Asia. They are largely employed in sex work and non-sexual performing arts, being shunned from many other careers by both devout Muslims and Hindus, and they even have their own ersatz kinship system and heterodox form of Hinduism.

The “pride” movement in the West seems to be a tamer form of this. Gay people are not necessarily proud of their sexuality, but they are forced to take pride in a surrogate ethnic group after coming to the realization that their lifestyle is fundamentally at odds with the continuation of their actual lineage and participation in the family, which is the basic unit of the ethnic group. Groups in history which, through some sort of accident of fate, lost their ability to reproduce, occasionally also adopted unusual social and sexual identities. The Scythian enaree come to mind.

Another group that comes to mind, oddly enough, is the Incel community. No, not “Incels”, which includes all people who would like to have sex but find themselves unable to, I’m talking specifically about the Incel community. This is a group which, unlike 90% of Incels, has been exposed to the “blackpill”. Somewhere, deep in their heart, they have already forfeited their virility. They have already accepted that they will fail to continue their own lineage, or anyone else’s, and so their identity as involuntarily celibate precedes any ethnic, religious, racial, or cultural identities they have. Their fellow lepers are an extremely diverse crowd, and they all insist that they are suffering (which, they definitely are), but they have a strange and unspoken pride in their Inceldom that I think everyone has caught onto by now. “Fakecel” is a massive insult, it’s stolen valor. “Truecel”, once a term to denote merely the most hideously ugly and destitute of Incels, has become something of a compliment. It implies a special kind of purity. The Trucel is Jesus on the cross, tortured beyond belief. He’s the starving Buddha, he’s Prometheus in chains. He’s Orpheus being torn apart by the Maenads, but one whose Euridyce never walked the mortal plane. Incels still have the sanity to recognize that their condition is a curse, an ailment, that could ideally be eradicated. I have met a few Transgenders who feel the same way, but most LGBTQ people feel like their condition is an integral part of who they are that they wouldn’t get rid of even if given the chance (unless “getting rid of” means magically transforming into the opposite sex).

Western progressives would like, in the above sense, to make everyone homosexual incels. They would like to reform the family in favor of the “found family”, because the family is the source of all of the reactionary perfumes that incense them. I used to not believe this, I believed it was just another way to avoid engaging with the ideas of Woke people like “Bioleninism” and “the heat map” and “virtue signaling”. That is not to say that these theories are false, just that they aren’t productive, because people often believe the right things for the wrong reasons. However, after spending 4 years touching grass, the pattern has become difficult to deny. Woke people who actually don’t come to play about this Woke shit are much more likely to have very little respect for their families. Sometimes this is because their families are actually not respectable, and sometimes it is because they themselves aren’t respectable, but the point is that they associate the family and all of the family-like things in this world — the nation, the church, the state, the social order, etc. — with negativity and skepticism.

Thanks for reading, and happy Scat Pride Month?